Productivity and efficiency improvement are the two pillars of growth Software. This is how he reflects Software Development Market Trends Report 2023 From project assessment tool Quanter Software Promoted by LedaMC. The results of the study are the result of the analysis of a database containing information on 65,000 projects carried out by 45 customers, taking into account 177 suppliers and fifty different technologies.
Quanter Research has developed a classification with the 20 most important technologies based on productivity To know “how much product”. Software We gain a unit effort.” The first place is occupied by Business Intelligence (BI), which occupies almost 50% of the advantage of the second technology. BI is followed by Salesforce and in third place is SAP ABAP 4 (the fourth generation programming language developed by SAP). At the other end of the scale are traditional Java and . Net are available.
On the other hand, he Software Development Market Trends Report 2023 Analyzes the lowest cost technology in the market. “Take as a reference the cost per unit of the product Software and not rate”, the study indicates that BI is the least expensive option. Specifically, 30% cheaper than Salesforce: “These findings highlight the importance of avoiding vendor lock-in, which can result in higher costs and lower productivity.” In fact, the results show that “the most expensive supplier is three times more expensive than the cheapest”. By analyzing what the same provider offers to its different customers, you can see the difference in cost, which can vary from 50 to 178% for the same technology.
Quality of development Software
Kwander also compared the quality of development. This feature has a direct impact on cost and price Time-market (From the time a product or service is planned until the customer accesses it) they point from the platform, which also affects the benefits of the applicable business. In this case it’s Visual Basic, a BI and power center, extraction, transformation and loading tool for creating data.
When the provider is taken into account, the results reflect the gap between the most expensive and the least expensive. Identified as “p13”, the most expensive provider is three times that of the cheapest provider. The difference in terms of cost and productivity is significant as there are 17% and 18% between the first two stages respectively.
The report concludes that the value offered to customers by providers varies significantly And one of them can charge three times as much as the best supplier, with productivity three times lower. Therefore, they advise from Kwander: “Looking at this data, we can infer that dependence on one supplier without competition leads to higher costs and lower productivity. Therefore, a comparative analysis is necessary Grading”.
Related posts
Copy to market, the quality of your software depends on it
“Listening to our customers can help us design more valuable software”
