In the current non-electoral process we are experiencing, where non-candidates are sharing ideas for an eventual government in the future, little has materialized so far. It is because of this that the former president’s proposal A Public Safety Organization basically Crime prevention And this Use of technology.
Undoubtedly HTechnical tools They should be one of the bases for the efficient performance of the authorities, however, the latest generation of technological advances will not be successful if they avoid the updates required by the current systems.
Much has been discussed since the motion to have Cameras Y Drones They may have a feeling that they are watching where we go and what we do Negative legal implicationa, because that personal information is stored by a government entity. Of course, in any case, we like to spread on social networks what we do and where we do it. In other words, no one takes this personal information from us, rather we gladly give it to the world.
But one of the serious problems with the proposal is its apparent intent Establishing patterns of criminal behavior Just for us appearance oh gait, Because, really, there is no such thing as “acting like a thug.” I remember the Tom Cruise movie”Minority Report” (previous sentence), in which The government was shut down to the people Before they commit a crime. Eventually the system fails.
By law, one’s presence near the scene of the crime crime not that Proof of liability. There is one near those 15 spots. Technology is needed to acquire and process evidence collected at crime scenes. Crimesthat is, Procedural crime scenes.
We are aware of countless cases where a person has had to defend themselves against an attack due to their proximity to a crime scene or worse.
Before Create databases with photos Y videos On the streets, it must be made Primary databases within the process Trial Offender, And that New technologies Artificial intelligence can complement, but not replace. That is, the first First National Fingerprint Bankwhat The ABCs of Criminology, it’s not in Mexico. If we have a photograph of someone near the scene of the crime, or if we know for certain that a gun was fired in one location and then another, it is of no use to us. Fingerprints at the scene or the murder weapon, and these can be compared with prints previously obtained elsewhere.
Neither in Mexico a Database for Genetic Materials. That is, a system in which DNA of potential perpetrators and victims should be recordedAs in other countries, having solid evidence against a potential perpetrator, documenting their presence at other crime scenes and A method of identifying the dead.
In America, in addition DNA databases There are legal mechanisms for cross-referencing what authorities hold with information held by private companies, such as those that might be employed today to search for relatives and ancestors. This can be a great help in identifying bodies in secret tombs in Mexico. DNA is legal evidence. Drone photo near crime scene, no.
There is a development further afield in Mexico database Details of crime scenes are recorded for the computer to detect matches and patterns. This is how a potential serial killer’s job is identified in other countries. We do not know of cases of this type of crime in Mexico, not because they are few, but because there is no way to recognize the similarities between one murder and another.
Implementation is an undeniable necessity Technological advances, as long as they are required. Otherwise, it would be like wanting to watch that movie on Netflix from Preliminaries, but having a TV with an antenna on the roof.
