Israel – Hamas War | Gaza Strip | USA | How the war in Gaza led to a rift between Israel and the United States | UN Security Council | Benjamin Netanyahu | the world

The war lasted for almost six months Gaza Strip has led to a solid relationship so far between Israel Y America Degenerate like some times. UN Resolution on Ceasefire in Palestine This was reflected when the North American country's representatives almost always vetoed a Security Council resolution after an unprecedented boycott. The decision angered Benjamin Netanyahu's government, which canceled a trip to Washington by a high-level delegation intended to discuss matters related to the military campaign.

Meera: The United States did not vote on the first “immediate ceasefire” resolution in the Security Council on Gaza.

Terrorist attacks by Hamas on October 7 prompted an Israeli military offensive with the express aim of eliminating the group, which has been in control of the Gaza Strip since 2007. “From the beginning, the Biden administration asked Netanyahu to do that.”The right way”, indicating prioritization of the security of civilians in the Palestinian territories.

However, Gaza's health ministry says more than 32,000 people have died since the war began, most of them civilians. Israel questions that it is a Hamas-controlled organization.

Despite this and being loyal to its policy of the past 75 years, the US has not hesitated to support its main ally in the Middle East in all possible fields until now. Either by sending military supplies, vetoing resolutions calling for a cease-fire, alleging that the release of hostages still in the hands of Hamas is not a priority, or through serious diplomatic efforts.

Not only did the US participate in talks promoted by Qatar and Egypt, but it also led to a brief ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in late November last year for a hostage exchange. And Biden himself hugged Netanyahu in December 2023, condemning terrorist attacks on Israeli soil and offering condolences to the victims' families.

For this reason, when the Security Council voted this Monday the 25th on a proposal by Russia and China to reach a ceasefire during Ramadan, it did not link it to the release of hostages – Israel's main demand – . It is surprising that the US delegation did not exercise its right of veto and did not vote.

– The Israeli response –

Upon learning of the US vote, the Israeli Prime Minister's Office released a statement describing it.A clear retreat from its consistent position on the Security Council since the start of the war“And confirming this”harming the war efforts and attempts to free the hostages”.

As a result, in addition, the same office announced the cancellation of a planned trip to Washington this week by National Security Adviser Tzachi Hanegbi and Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer.

“It is a resolution adopted within the framework of Article 6 of the Charter of the United Nations; That is, it does not mean prohibitions, it is above all a declaration. It would have been otherwise if it had been accepted on the basis of Article 7. But something as obvious as destroying Hamas, the Israeli government didn't understand what the US did, so it took it too seriously. “Islamic State is questionable.”explains to Trade Gabriel Ben Taskal, a political analyst specializing in Middle East affairs and director of HadChat Hasheni.

The U.S. government agreed to “Very disappointingNetanyahu's decision, according to White House spokesman John Kirby.

The main purpose of Hanekby and Dermer's trip was to ask for US alternatives to avoid ground action in Rafah, one of the biggest points of friction between Israel and the US. While Netanyahu sees action on the southern city as essential, Biden calls the option a “Red lineBecause this is where the 1.4 million displaced Gazans left by the war have been housed so far.

“The big controversy and debate here is that the US notes that an Israeli attack on Rafah, the last bastion with four organized Hamas battalions, cannot be confirmed without first mobilizing the one and a half million Palestinians there. The US says that population must be moved, the influx of humanitarian aid must be seriously increased and Rafah must not be attacked because it will be serious. Israel responds that it will attack with or without US help because there is hope among the government and the people to oust Hamas from government. For that they need to topple Rafa or they can regain control of the area.”, explains Ben Taskal.

However, the reasons behind the American abstention are not limited to concern for the citizens of Gaza, but also respond to the current president's electoral interests.

Although Biden is the virtual Democratic nominee for the November presidential election, during his party's primaries we saw the strengthening of the 'noncommittal' movement, which mainly arises as a protest against US support for Israel during the war.

The Democratic base fears that the growth of disaffection will seriously damage their re-election bids in their election showdown against Donald Trump.

For example, this concern was reflected in Biden's State of the Union address a few weeks ago, when he announced, among other things, that the US military would build a temporary port in Gaza. Public.

“There is a real situation and that is the internal pressure of the party The Democratic Party is important to Joe Biden, especially at election time. Progressive or left-wing forces among Democrats are more important and are pushing Biden to reduce support for Israel, among other things, because it could take away support from African-American and Muslim groups. Faced with this situation, the President is forced to take some declaratory and practical moves to save the critical situation.”, comments the analyst.

– Past tenses –

During Israel's 75 years, the United States has been its main ally. Billions of dollars in military aid are sent annually from North America to the Israeli military; Washington has also played a key role in Jewish peace agreements with their Arab neighbors and in numerous attempts to resolve their conflict with the Palestinians.

However, the path has not always been happy and Netanyahu knows firsthand how to raise sparks with his American ally.

“This is not the first time Netanyahu has challenged the US government; He has previously dared to go before both houses of the US Congress to speak out against the Iran nuclear deal. “Thus, this is not the first time that Netanyahu has challenged the US government and Democratic presidents.” Ben Taskal comes to mind.

The episode the analyst refers to took place in March 2015, when the Israeli prime minister arrived at the invitation of the Republican Congress — when protocol dictates that the White House send these types of calls — to warn the lower house. Security Risks in Reaching a Deal with Iran

For Ben Daskal, that speech emboldened America a year and a half later “A big betrayal”.

“This is not the first time the Democrats have done this. Barack Obama, in 2016, before handing it over to Donald Trump, did not veto Resolution 2334, the more radical resolution that determined Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories beyond the Green Line. This is a strong way of saying that the territories are occupied, while another view says that the territories are disputed. It's a big betrayal, but it's relatively small.”, he assures.