Your browser does not support HTML5 audio
Congressmen Patricia Chirinos (Avanza Pais), Edgar Tello (Magisterial Volume), Louis of Aragon (popular act), Luis Cordero John Day (popular act), Jose Gerry (We are Peru) and Ilyich Lopez (Ungrouped) This Tuesday the Interim Attorney of the Nation presented a constitutional complaint against Juan Carlos Villena.
A complaint was lodged with them Subcommittee on Constitutional Impeachment of Parliament For offenses like abuse of power, predation, illegal sponsorship, threats against elected officials and neglect of duty.
And, they ask Disqualification 10 years out of public service for alleged violation of 7 articles of Magna Carta.
Grounds of complaint
According to the document, the constitutional complaint has its origins in reality Supreme Prosecutor Delia Espinosa It was decided to join the ongoing investigations against former Attorney General Patricia Benowitz. Members of Congress: Martha Lupe Moyano Dinh, Patricia Rosa Chirinos Venegas, Jose Maria Balcazar Gelada, Jagelina Katie Ugarte Mamani, Niverdo Edgar dello Montes, German Adolf Taguri Valdivia, Luis Gustavo Lamb, John Day, Jose Daniel, Lucion Shook, Angel Shaw, Enrique Shook Jeri Ore, Ilich Fredy Lopez Ureña, Cesar Manuel Revilla Villanueva, Jorge Luis Flores Ancachi and Alexander Soto Reyes.
In that sense, Espinoza Valenzuela's attitude is a “Second-class officerDespite the fact that, below the nation's attorney, he is “the only authority authorized to issue orders to members of Congress to initiate preliminary investigation proceedings.”
Therefore, they consider it Villena's decision to hand over the investigation to Attorney Espinosa “Violates legal policy, Constitution, Organic Law of Public Ministry or Law no. 27399 to the extent that it constitutes the exercise of a power not conferred by s.
“In this context, there is an expression Violation of due process “Granting to the Attorney General the powers to conduct preliminary investigations of the Congress of the Republic improperly by the present prosecutor of the country, such investigations in the practice of constitutional impeachment of alleged crimes of activities attributable to public officials only on the basis of an executive rule approved by the authority of the Public Ministry,” the text points out.
For all these reasons, the Nation's Interim Attorney would have violated the Constitution, “at the same time, He was hurt Institutional Guarantees Surrounding Parliamentary Functioning”.
Details of the complaint filed against Juan Carlos VillenaSource: RPP News
They accuse him of “dereliction of duty”.
On the other hand, 6 Members of Parliament questioned the fact that Juan Carlos Villena did not initiate investigations against the former Attorney General. Pablo Sanchez, To broadcast a report Vilax TV
“On March 21, 2024, in the program Beto a Saber on Vilax TV, the journalist IDL-Reporters“Romina Andrea Mella Pardo, on behalf of the country's attorney, Pablo Sánchez Velarde, was in charge of coordinating with Brazil's federal public ministry attorney, Delton Tallagnol,” the complaint states.
“This report in question, the Supreme Prosecutor Sánchez Velarde would have allowed the intervention of individuals in the activities of the Public Ministry, and then under his responsibility, in a certain way, confirm the statements. Jaime Javier Villanueva“About the fact that an NGO controls an autonomous constitutional body responsible for criminal action,” he adds.
In view of this, the complainants noted that “Despite all the revelations involving the Supreme Prosecutor Sánchez Velarde, the Acting Prosecutor of the Nation, Juan Carlos Villena Campana, Absolute silence shows In spite of these facts, the presiding officer of the criminal proceedings and the presiding officer of the preliminary investigation into the commission of the offenses alleged against the State authorities.”
“This inaction would clearly constitute guilt Crime of NeglectRefusal or delay in operational activities regulated under Section 377 of the Penal Code,” they point out.
