Congress Rejects Disqualification of JNJ Chairman Antonio De La Jaza: Keys to Poll | National Judicial Board | Jose Luna | Constitutional impeachment | principle

Plenary session of Congress The 67 votes needed to disqualify the President of National Judicial Board (JNJ), Antonio de la Haza. This culminated in proceedings against all members of the company, which he was able to remove Inez Tello and Aldo Vasquez.

The report recommended disqualification of De La Haza for 10 years for violation of Articles 139 and 156. Constitution Only 42 votes were received in favor of it. Meanwhile, 36 votes against and 10 abstentions were recorded.

Since this is a constitutional charge, at least a sanction is required 67 admissions excluding members of the Permanent Commission. That means he got 25 votes less than required for disqualification From Hasacontinue his duties as member and chairman J.N.J.

Only the Fuerza Popular and Renovación Popular benches voted for disqualification.

Here is the poll:

Bench Number of members Pros vs In neglect
Popular Force 22 14 0 0
Free Peru 12 5 1 0
Alliance for Progress 11 0 5 2
Democratic Transition – Together for Peru 11 0 9 0
We can grow 10 4 2 0
Magisterial Vol 9 3 3 1
Popular update 9 7 0 0
Developments of the country 9 2 1 2
A popular act 8 0 3 3
Peru Bicentennial 5 0 3 0
We are Peru 5 2 0 0
Not grouped 19 5 9 2
Total 130 42 36 10

Maybe Antonio de la Haza Last resolved in plenary session of Congress. Last Thursday he disqualified Inés Tello and Aldo Vásquez with 67 votes and rejected the dismissal of Guillermo Thornberry, María Zavala and Imelda Tumialan.

In the same session, the motion to disqualify de la Jaza had already been rejected by 51 in favor, 31 against and 8 votes. However, Congressman Jorge Montoya (Renovasian Popular) reconsidered the decision, which was approved by a parliamentary majority.

See also  Sisfoh 2024: Check Official Register to Know Socio Economic Status of Your Household | Answers

They don't count Jose Luna's votes

Before hearing the case of the leader of the JNJ, Sigrid Bazan, spokesperson for Democratic Change – Together for Peru, presented a point of order in parliament to assess whether the votes against the JNJ members were legal.

Despite being a member of the Permanent Commission, Bazan's proposal answered questions raised by the vote of Congressman José Luna Galvez (Podemos Peru).

The Constitution and the rules of Congress indicate that legislators forming a permanent party cannot vote in plenary session on a constitutional impeachment.

However, according to Parliament's interpretation, since he did not do so on the aforementioned occasion, Luna was empowered to exercise his vote. Without their support, the 67 grafts to remove Tello and Vásquez would not have been achieved.

Although Bazán asked for a reassessment of this position, the proposal was rejected by a parliamentary majority. It got only 32 votes in favor. Meanwhile, there were 81 votes against and two abstentions.

This is the vote on regulation:

Countertops Number of members Pros vs In neglect
Popular Force 22 0 22 0
Free Peru 12 1 9 0
Alliance for Progress 11 0 9 0
Democratic Transition – Together for Peru 11 11 0 0
We can grow 10 4 4 0
Magisterial Vol 9 3 6 0
Popular update 9 0 8 0
Developments of the country 9 0 7 0
A popular act 8 6 0 0
Peru Bicentennial 5 1 3 1
We are Peru 5 0 4 0
Not grouped 19 6 9 1
Total 130 32 81 2

The assemblyman accused Montoya of “managing a disinformation campaign.” National Judicial Board and his followers” ​​to question the legality of the disqualification of Tello and Vasquez.

Meanwhile, Congresswoman Ruth Luk (United for Democratic Change – Peru) highlighted the fact that legislators from Axion Popular and Peru Bicentenario switched their votes after the crackdown on JNJ members. Vásquez was disqualified last Thursday.

See also  Annual inflation eases in March but remains within target range | Price increase | INEI | CPI | economy

“In the end, only two of the team were disqualified. J.N.J. If the vote is reviewed, there are committees that can reverse their decision. This confirms that there is no objective result. Even point of order is not accepted.”said.

Unlike the first vote against Vázquez, the second vote saw Congressman Raul Dorotio (a popular act) abstain.

Also, Congressman Jorge Luis Flores Ancachi (also from Axion Popular) did not participate in the first ballot, but participated in the second ballot to vote for disqualification. Jorge Marticorena (Perú Bicentenario) initially voted against the permit, but later supported it.

Tello rejected the disqualification

A few hours later, Inez Dello promised to continue “legally” as a member of the JNJ, but Congress had already officially declared her disqualification through a resolution published in the official newspaper El Peruano.

“I am legal. […] I knew from the first moment that I was the target of all this attack against the military regime. […] “They want to impose a system of interpretation of laws, but a vote from Mr. Luna Galvez should not be counted”He said in a conversation with Canal Me.

The lawyer added: “Congress misconstrues the interpretation of the Constitution. […] “All interpretations must be in favor of the individual.”.

Congresswoman Gladys Echaíz (popular renewal) promised to nominate Tello to “act according to the demands of his position, with dignity and respect for the law.”

Echaíz supported José Luna's participation and pointed out that Tello had already been officially disqualified.

Tello and Vasquez's tenure as JNJ members ended in about 10 months. However, both must be replaced by alternate members of the organization with a decision of Congress.

See also  Buffalo Woman Rescues Man From Storm, Freezes After Pleading For Help On Facebook Livestream

Read more

Local News