Henry Shimabukuro filed a constitutional complaint against Patricia Chirinos and Luis Aragon at a Security Commission hearing.

Henry ShimabukuroThe former adviser to the Government Palace and the ‘shadow cabinet’ investigated the case and filed a constitutional complaint. Parliament Against legislators Patricia Chirinos Y Louis of Aragon For what happened on November 30 during a session of the Congressional Committee on Security, which he called.

A complaint was lodged with them Congressional Impeachment Subcommittee Against the two legislators for alleged offenses of usurpation of power and abuse of power, for their actions in that session of the working group.

Later, the person under investigation exercised his right to remain silent and avoided answering a list of questions put to him at the task force he chairs. Patricia Chirinos. “As the chairman of this commission is being investigated along with a criminal organization, I cannot answer any questions Patricia Benavides” Shimabukuro then said.

Allegations of ill-treatment of legislators

In his complaint, the person being investigated said that after this intervention before the task force, Assemblyman Chirinos told him that he would not allow him to be disrespected, so he should “shut up and answer the questions asked.” Will do”.

The commission adds that Shimabukuro tried to speak to the head of his lawyer’s task force; However, he did not allow himself to advocate for his client.

Likewise, he pointed out that Congress was given space at another stage of the session Louis of Aragonwho rejected the above decision to remain silent and called him a criminal.

“Madam President, since what we are going to say is within a tax investigation, criminals cannot come here and be disrespectful.” Immediately, the interrogated person pointed out that the legislator had asked for his removal from the executive committee session and again described him as a “depraved criminal”.

See also  Four countries' embassies express concern over anti-forestry law approved by Peruvian Congress

He was then taken to the headquarters of the 19th Preparatory Trial Court, where the judge in charge indicated. custody According to a resolution released during his identity-control hearing, he was free.

The subject of the investigation claims that both Congressmen treated him “in a bad manner, with humiliating, derogatory and offensive words”.

Therefore, he held that both the legislators violated the rule Constitution It mentions dignity, non-discrimination and honor and reputation in its Articles 1 and 2 in its Articles 2 and 7, as well as Article 38 for non-respect and non-compliance with the Magna Carta.

Read more

Local News