about this Non-commissioned officer Javier Bruno Espinoza, more than 30 sanctions and a retirement dateAccording to official information accessed by El Comercio through a request protected by the Transparency and Public Access to Information Act.
Amurus requested the non-commissioned officers through a letter sent to PNP Col. Luis Ruiz Astahuman, former head of the security division of Congress. Of the 8 requested, the PNP allocated five who did not appear on its list and three others.
He Non-commissioned officer Bruno was not assigned and continued to serve in the Kalaw Police Region.
This is Roselli Amurus' request:
El Comercio reported last December that 11 congressmen had recommended with the PNP in the appointment of their bodyguards.
The executive director of the Police Legal Protection Institute, Jesús Poma Zamudio, indicated that “we will face the alleged crime of abuse of power.”
private file
The Human Resources Directorate of the PNP provided El Comercio with every personnel file needed by the 11 congressmen.
Among the documents, the file of non-commissioned officer Bruno was distinguished. It shows that in his first year as a police officer in 1999, he received five bans for negligence, disobedience, breach of police spirit and dereliction of duty or duty.
Next year Received due to disciplinary action, one of the most severe obstacles. and retired in 2002.
Bruno rejoined the police in April 2005 on a court order. However, less than a year later, he was readmitted for missing a day without justification and failing to comply with a current order.
In 2014, he caused a traffic accident for which the PNP punished him with six days simple reprimand.
He was traveling on Venezuela Avenue near San Marcos Stadium when he crashed multiple times, causing property damage and minor injuries, according to police documents on the accident on XII Avenue, San Miguel.
Bruno denied that he escaped before the PNP Disciplinary Office. Instead, he said he had reached an agreement with the drivers of the affected vehicles.
This is part of the PNP's resolution to account for the accident and impose a sanction on the petty officer:
Bruno has accumulated sanctions for being negligent in the performance of his duties, abandoning his duty position to carry out activities unrelated to it without reasonable cause, among other reasons..
A non-commissioned officer was penalized with written reprimands, days of simple sanction and days of simple arrest.
Boma explained that the days of simple bans meant deducting points in the discipline standard. Meanwhile, ordinary arrestees are required to have a non-commissioned officer in his ward for any matter as long as the permit lasts.
This is the list of sanctions against Petty Officer Javier Bruno Espinoza:
DATE | The reason | permission |
---|---|---|
23/06/2016 | Failure to meet deadlines for processing, serving or sending documents, unless justified. | 6 days simple permit |
23/04/2015 | Failure to comply with directives, plans, instructions, orders or current regulations. | 6 days simple permit |
16/03/2015 | Acting in scandals in plainclothes outside the service affects the corporate image. | 6 days simple permit |
28/04/2015 | Harming the personnel of the National Police of Peru acting as guarantor without fulfilling the financial guarantee. | Written warning |
01/02/2013 | Failure to comply with directives, plans, instructions, orders or current regulations. | Written warning |
04/10/2012 | Failure to attend an instruction, ceremony, conference or other service activity for which you have been appointed or is obliged to attend without reasonable excuse. | 4 days simple arrest |
12/04/2012 | Failure to comply with orders, programs, instructions, directives and other rules in force in the National Police of Peru. | 6 days simple arrest |
06/08/2011 | Abandoning your duty to take unrelated actions without reasonable excuse. | 2 days simple arrest |
20/04/2011 | Carry out any action or opinion that divides or affects harmony among the personnel of the National Police of Peru. | 6 days simple arrest |
29/03/2011 | Lack of interest in performing duties of service or police work. | 2 days simple arrest |
30/12/2010 | They are negligent in doing their duty. | warning |
07/12/2010 | Speak to superiors in a way that violates the rules of courtesy or civility, whether in a retired or available situation. | 3 days simple arrest |
03/09/2010 | Taking without authorization clothing, equipment, or property belonging to personnel of the Government or the National Police of Peru, and returning them, unless damage or harm is caused. | 2 days simple arrest |
16/07/2010 | Arriving late at your work center or leaving before the specified time without reasonable excuse. | 2 days simple arrest |
14/07/2010 | Lack of interest in performing duties of service or police functions. | 6 days simple arrest |
02/07/2010 | Driving a police vehicle without a valid license or not being authorized to drive it, or ordering an unauthorized person to do so, does not constitute a serious or very serious offence. | 6 days simple arrest |
29/12/2009 | Obligation to attend or attend with unreasonable delay any listing, instruction, function, conference or other activity of the service prescribed by you | 4 days simple arrest |
17/11/2009 | Providing false information, your general information, address and communication methods or not communicating changes in a timely manner to the unit you provide services to. | warning |
24/09/2019 | Abandoning your duty to take unrelated actions without reasonable excuse. | 6 days simple arrest |
21/07/2009 | Failure to comply with orders, programs, instructions, directives and other rules in force in the National Police of Peru. | 6 days simple arrest |
29/04/2009 | Not in the jurisdiction where you provide the Services. | 12 correction days |
25/03/2008 | Failure to comply with current PNP directive. | 6 days simple permit |
18/08/2007 | Acting carelessly. | 6 correction days |
25/06/2007 | Acting carelessly. | 6 correction days |
07/10/2006 | Exceed deadlines for permits, commissions, etc. | 10 correction days |
31/03/2006 | Failure to comply with current PNP directive. | 6 correction days |
17/03/2006 | A day is missing without justice. | 6 correction days |
18/02/2000 | It is against the rules of respect. | 6 simple days |
11/02/2000 | It is against the rules of respect. | 8 simple days |
20/11/1999 | Abandonment of Service or Rule. | 10 simple days |
11/10/1999 | Due to negligence | 8 simple days |
05/08/1999 | The opposite of obedience | 8 simple days |
27/06/1999 | Anti-police spirit | 12 simple days |
26/02/1999 | Abandonment of Service or Rule. | 10 simple days |
Make the superior responsible for your safety
Last January, when El Comercio opened an investigation into the case, Amuruz confirmed that he requested non-commissioned officer Bruno on the recommendation of his vice president. I trust and believe in your professional judgement, that's why I made the formal request,” he said.
There are eight police officers for the security of the legislator. As El Comercio reported last December, it receives “exceptional” police protection through a decision by the PNP's Directorate of State Security.
Amurus vowed to maintain professional relations only with police officers who provide protection to him.
“I recently met police officers who were appointed to the Congress for strict work reasons and through Parliament. Since you informed me of a certain name, I inquired with the head of my bodyguard and he told me that this person was never appointed to my team because of the restrictions you pointed out. So, he does not work in my environment. ,” he added.
El Comercio searched for Bruno Espinoza, a non-commissioned officer, at the address registered as his address in the National Register of National Identity and Civil Status (Reniec) to collect his security. At the same place he left a letter with the information and contact number we have described in this report, but there was no response.
Permission and threat
Last Monday, Amurus Then he lost his composure Ethics Commission It cleared him for lying about his participation in organizing a birthday party for his partner Paul Garcia in 2023.
A visibly upset congressman, the commission's chairman, Congressman Diego Bazano, stunned the task force members by publishing information against him.
Earlier, he was publicly reprimanded and fined equivalent to 60 days' salary for violating Sections 1, 2 and 4 of the Parliamentary Code of Conduct, based on the principle of transparency and respect for parliamentary investment.
In effect, the Ethics Commission spared Amurus because it only cleared him of a minor charge. Last year he agreed to exonerate her from a more serious charge: allegedly recommending the hiring of at least eight people related to her partner in Congress.
Amurus said in a conversation with Canal N last Monday that he is serving as a congressman. And he added: “I could easily stay in the private sector.”